Agriculture occupies a critical position in the country’s economy, ensuring food security, providing livelihoods, and indeed as a way of life for most rural people. Due to many reasons, growth in agriculture has been largely driven by groundwater based irrigation, powered by electricity. It is also certain that the dominance of groundwater will continue in the coming years.
From the early 1990s, a significant thread in the story of reforms in electricity sector has been the financial unsustainability of the distribution sector. One of the reasons cited has been the subsidised supply of electricity to agriculture. Subsidised supply has also been held responsible for poor quality of supply and excessive use of groundwater. Increasing the agriculture electricity tariffs has been a major suggestion for improving distribution sector finances.
In spite of several decades of this approach, the problems persist. An important reason for this is the failure to acknowledge the strong and complex linkages between the electricity, water and agriculture sectors, and to recognise that it is practically impossible to address the issues of one without comprehensively addressing challenges in all the other sectors.
With this in mind, this discussion paper in two volumes brings out the linkages between electricity, water and agriculture sectors. It also highlights the need to take these linkages into consideration when planning agricultural electricity supply. Volume 1 of the paper focuses on an overview of the linkages and Volume 2 provides a detailed analysis of the electricity sector related issues of the linkage.
It is our hope that this discussion paper would catalyse a healthy discussion among actors in electricity, water and agriculture sectors, towards a better understanding of the challenges and evolving sustainable solutions.
Household air pollution caused by smoke from burning solid fuels for cooking is a major source of mortality and morbidity in India. Recent studies estimate that it is also a major contributor to outdoor pollution in addition to contributing to four of the five leading causes of mortality and morbidity. This problem also has a significant gender dimension. A rapid transition to clean-burning fuels and technologies for cooking can potentially address this challenge.
While the Government has announced programs such as the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana and the National Clean Air Program, given the scale of the challenge in India, a coordinated national mission to move towards smokeless cooking would be useful. The note proposes setting up of such a mission and suggests contours of how such a mission could be structured, what its objectives could be, how it may operate and how it may be overseen. This mission proposal has benefited from the views of participants at a roundtable discussion jointly organized by Prayas and the Collaborative Clean Air Policy Centre on June 20, 2018 in New Delhi and discussions with various experts in the relevant sectors.
We hope this mission proposal initiates a conversation on the necessary institutional and policy framework to rapidly transition to smoke-free cooking in India.
Millions of households in India still use solid fuels for cooking today. This is an important energy access, health and environmental problem as household air pollution caused by burning solid fuels for cooking is a major source of mortality and morbidity as well as outdoor air pollution in India. There is also a gender dimension to this as it is primarily women who cook and fetch solid fuels. At the same time, multiple clean fuel-technologies have the potential to address this challenge. Given this multi-dimensional, multi-fuel nature of the problem, there is a need to involve different stakeholders from relevant sectors to accelerate the transition to clean fuel-technologies through targeted policy. It is in this context that a roundtable discussion was organized by Prayas (Energy Group), Prayas (Health Group) and the Collaborative Clean Air Policy Centre (CCAPC) to deliberate on the institutional architecture of a mission for clean cooking energy called "Clean Cooking Mission: A way to transition to completely smoke-free kitchens" on June 20, 2018 in New Delhi.
The roundtable began with background presentations by Prayas and CCAPC, which were followed by a discussion among the participants on selected questions. It was attended by representatives from the government, academia, think tanks and practitioners covering the energy, health, environment and gender aspects of the problem.
The report below summarizes the discussions that took place and provides a complete list of participants. The presentations are also available below. The Prayas presentation is based on the Prayas report Fuelling the transition.
It is estimated that more than half of the Indian households use solid fuels for cooking even in 2018. This is not only an important energy access problem but also one with very adverse health impacts. Household air pollution arising from burning solid fuels for cooking is one of the leading contributors to mortality and disease burden in India. At the same time, India is committed to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals which includes providing clean, modern fuels to all by 2030. The government has launched the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana to distribute subsidised LPG connections to poor households.
In this context, we model and analyse four possible transition scenarios to modern cooking fuels and technologies, which shows that transition to modern fuel-technologies is a very cost-effective health intervention. The most aggressive transition involving a mix of modern fuels not only reduces the disease burden associated with cooking by more than half, but is also the most cost-effective. But if households do not shift to modern fuels completely, the analysis shows that stacking of solid fuels with modern fuels significantly erodes the health benefit of modern fuels. In order to help complete modern fuel adoption, consumer fuel pricing and targeted subsidies for poor households are necessary as fuel costs dominate the financial costs of the transition. The analysis also considers improved biomass cookstoves and concludes that the adverse health impacts from using even the best-in-class improved cookstoves are non-trivial. However, given their greater efficiency and lower emissions in comparison to traditional stoves, they can potentially be an intermediate technology in the shift to modern fuels.
The cooking fuel access problem is a multi-dimensional problem. Therefore, if India wants to rapidly fuel the transition to modern fuels, the solution should also be multi-dimensional and involve multiple fuels, stakeholders and strategies.
The central government’s flagship programme to provide free liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) connections to poor women has been in operation for two years, providing more than 3.5 crore LPG connections . This much-needed scheme is a major step to reduce indoor air pollution, drudgery faced by women, and one that promises to extend LPG access with significant potential health benefits. The programme has largely succeeded in disbursing LPG connections to poor households, but little is known about the progress of the scheme with respect to LPG use. Has it led to sustained use of clean fuels among poor households? While this article attempts to answer that question, there is need for more information about the scheme in the public domain for a comprehensive evaluation and mid-course correction to help achieve all its social objectives.
A version of this article was published in the Economic and Political Weekly on 19th May 2018.
Coal India Ltd had uploaded the key highlights and summary of a draft Coal Vision 2030 document and sought stakeholder comments. PEG's submission in this regard is available below. Comments are broken into two categories - overarching comments about the process of drafting the coal vision document, seeking feedback and cross-cutting issues; and specific comments about points made in the draft vision document. The submission was shared with officials of Coal India Ltd. and the Ministry of Coal.
On 6th October 2017, the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC) vide its order in case no 135 of 2017 allowed the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd (MSEDCL) to procure around 1000 MW of short-term power at higher cost than the ceiling rate of Rs. 4 per unit that the commission had set for such procurement about a year ago. The reason for this was that MSEDCL claimed that around 6600 MW of its contracted capacity was unavailable due to coal shortage. As a result of this, MSEDCL was also forced to undertake distress load shedding in the state. Out of MSEDCL’s total contracted capacity of 33,496 MW, more than one-third belongs to Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Ltd (MSPGCL) and more than 60% of MSPGCL’s coal based capacity was unavailable during this period. It is important to note that the claims regarding coal shortage made by MSPGCL are contrary to the public statements made by the Ministry of Coal regarding coal availability and the data published by Coal India Ltd (CIL) regarding coal production and supply. Hence, it becomes important to evaluate whether the coal shortage claimed by MSPGCL and some other generators in the state could have been avoided by better planning.
Therefore, in order to bring in more clarity regarding coal procurement and generation planning processes, Prayas (Energy Group) has filed a petition before the MERC seeking a thorough analysis and examination of the reasons leading to sudden fall in availability of MSEDCL’s contracted capacity during September 2017. Prayas has demanded that the MERC should undertake such analysis based on data such as actual indents issued by MSPGCL to the concerned coal companies for coal requisition, coal supplied by CIL against such indents, and the details regarding how MSPGCL is utilising the coal supply contracted for its capacity (4522 MW) that is under planned economic and/or reserve shut down.
Prayas has submitted that the crisis like situation that emerged in September 2017 should be used as an opportunity to thoroughly evlauate generation planning and coal procurement processes in the state. Based on this analysis and to avoid such issues in future, the Commission should consider issuing specific process directions to the concerned companies. The petition is yet to be listed for hearing before the Commission.
Readily available and reliable energy data is fundamental to effective analysis and policymaking for the energy sector. Energy statistics of high quality, systematically compiled and effectively disseminated, not only support governments to ensure national security and evaluate energy policies, but they also guide investment decisions in both the private and public sectors.
In this study, energy data management in four countries – Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States – are examined from both organizational and operational perspectives. With insights from these best practices, we present a framework for the evaluation of national energy data management systems. It can be used by national statistics compilers to assess their chosen model and to identify areas for improvement. We then use India as a test case for this framework to assess how India may adapt and evolve its energy data management systems.
This study was published in the August 2017 issue of the journal 'Energy Policy' (link to the paper). The manuscript submitted to 'Energy Policy' is attached below.
NITI Aayog published a Draft National Energy Policy in June 2017 and invited comments. Following are the comments submitted by PEG for the same.
The Government of India announced a new policy called SHAKTI to allocate coal to power sector consumers in May 2017. This article analysing SHAKTI and its impact on the power and coal sectors was published in Business Standard of 25th June 2017. It concludes that, while the policy announcement will bring in short-term relief, it is unlikely to contribute to the long-term goals of the sector which requires efficient thermal generation, competitive markets and flexible contracts. Instead, it could fragment coal and power generation along public and private sector lines, with consumers having to bear the costs of the resultant inefficiencies.